Ram Ayodhya Yadav @ Buchul Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31485 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Ram Ayodhya Yadav @ Buchul Yadav son of LATE SHIVJI YADAV Village- Gajipur, Police Station -Sinha O.P, District -Bhojpur 2.

MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV SON OF KISHUN BIHARI YADAV Village- Gajipur, Police Station -Sinha O.P, District -Bhojpur 3.

MANISH YADAV SON OF KISHUN BIHARI YADAV Village- Gajipur, Police Station -Sinha O.P, District -Bhojpur 4.

MANGAL YADAV SON OF LATE SHIVJI YADAV Village- Gajipur, Police Station -Sinha O.P, District -Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Radha Krishna, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354B, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, these petitioners are alleged to have grabbed the informant and attempted to make her sit inside the vehicle.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31485 of 2024(3) dt.30-07-2024 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that due to petty dispute between the parties, this false and concocted case has been lodged. As a matter of fact, these petitioners and informant are of the same family and it is absurd and improbable that brothers will commit such an offence. Moreover, the dispute has already been resolved between the parties. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation, the fact that dispute has already been resolved between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 6th-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Bhojpur, Arrah, in connection with Barhara Simha P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31485 of 2024(3) dt.30-07-2024 3/3 the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T