← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30249/2019rejected

Sonu Kumar Singh @ Sonu Singh @ Gandhi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30249 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-582 Year-2018 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SONU KUMAR SINGH @ SONU SINGH @ GANDHI S/o Suresh Singh R/o village- Sedhuar, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra 2.

Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu Singh S/o Suresh Singh R/o village- Sedhuar, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sachida Nand Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Chapra Town P.S. case No. 582 of 2018 registered under Section 413, 414/34 of the IPC.

The S.H.O. got information that three persons riding on a motor cycle were talking to each other to commit theft of vehicles. On such the police chased the motorcyclists and one Sumant Kumar was apprehended and two pillion rider Manoranjan Rai and Dhiraj Kumar managed to flee away. On the disclosure of Sumant Kumar house of petitioners, who are full brothers, was searched and many stolen motor cycles and other articles were recovered. The petitioners managed to flee

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30249 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 away after seeing the police.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have no manner of concern with Sumant Kumar but it appears that on the basis of disclosure made by Sumant Kumar raid was conducted in the house of petitioners and from there many stolen motorcycles and other articles were recovered.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T