← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/816/2014dismissed

Shankar Giri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-29Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.816 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9094 of 2010 =========================================================== Shankar Giri son of Late Bal Kishun Giri @ Late Lal Babu Giri resident of village - Malpura, P.O. & P.S. Kateya, District - Gopalganj, at present residing at 5 - D/11, North Shrikrishnapuri, P.S. Shrikrishnapuri, District - Patna .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department ( Formerly Known as Human Resources Development Department ), Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education ( Formerly Known as Director Human Resources Development Department ), Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Kosi Division, Saharsa

5. The District Education Officer, Araria

6. The Headmaster, Project Girls High School, Narpatganj, District - Araria .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Gyanand Roy, Advocate.

For the State : Mr. S.RAZA AHMAD, AAG-5 Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad, AC to AAG-5 ===========================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 29-09-2016 The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to an order passed by the learned Single Bench on 26.03.2014 whereby the claim of the appellant for seeking quashing of the office order dated 22nd July, 2008 by which claim of the appellant for absorption on the post of Peon in Project Girls' High School, Narpatganj, Araria was rejected.

It has been found that the appellant was appointed on

Patna High Court LPA No.816 of 2014 dt.29-09-2016 2/2 daily wage, at the rate of Rs. 10/- per day, without any public advertisement in the year 1991. Since the appointment of the appellant was not by norms fixed for public employment, there cannot be any direction for absorption. Such is a view taken by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Sevak Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported as 2013(1) PLJR 964.

In view of the aforesaid fact, we do not find any error in the order passed by the learned Single Bench which may warrant interference in the present Letters Patent Appeal and the same stands dismissed.

(Hemant Gupta, J) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar U