Sukesh Singh @ Sukesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29924 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2023 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sukesh Singh @ Sukesh Ray, aged about 32 years, Male, Son of Ram Bihari Singh, Resident of village- Ishwarpura, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 391 of 2023 dated 30.08.2023 for the offences punishable u/s 307 read with Section 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 55.980 litres of illicit foreign liquor kept in two plastic sacks as well as one black color Passion pro and two live cartridges was recovered from the corn field of Nirmal Mishra.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29924 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 2/3 this case. The name of the petitioner is disclosed by the local chowkidar. The petitioner has eight criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in six cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29924 of 2024(2) dt.19-07-2024 3/3 enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bhojpur At Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 391 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail bonds is liable to be cancelled.

7. This application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/amanU T