Vidyanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24129 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2020 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Vidyanand Yadav Son of Late Dev Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Korra Bajitpur, P.S. - Ghosi, District - Jehanabad. 2.
Vibha Rani Wife of Vidyanand Yadav Resident of Village - Korra Bajitpur, P.S. - Ghosi, District - Jehanabad.
3.
Kishore Kumar Son of Vidyanand Yadav Resident of Village - Korra Bajitpur, P.S. - Ghosi, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. S.M. Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-10-2020 The Court proceeding has been conducted through virtual mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Since the court proceeding in physical mode is non-functional, due to present pandemic, COVID-19, the matter is listed with defects.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks of resumption of court proceeding in physical mode. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24129 of 2020(2) dt.08-10-2020 2/3 matter before the bench.
The petitioners, being the parents and brother of the husband of the victim, are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that the daughter of the informant, Priti Kumari was married with Krishna Murari in May, 2019 but subsequent to the marriage there was further demand of dowry and for non-fulfillment of the same, torture was inflicted. On 13.01.2020, the husband of the victim informed the informant that Priti Kumari was not in the house, thereafter, search was made and her dead body was recovered from the bush near railway line.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are in-laws of the victim and there is no specific overt act against them. It is further submitted that the husband of the victim is in judicial custody. Learned APP submits that the petitioners are named in the FIR.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24129 of 2020(2) dt.08-10-2020 3/3 within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 21 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) DKS/- U T