Rashid Iqbal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8523 of 2013 ====================================================== Rashid Iqbal Son Of Md. Abul Khair Resident Of Village - Azimabad, Post Office - Bagha, Police Station - Azimabad, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
2. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Bhojpur At Ara Through Its Presiding Officer
3. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Bhojpur, At Ara
5. The Block Development Officer, Sandesh Block, District - Bhojpur
6. The District Education Officer, Bhojpur
7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Khandol, Block - Sandesh, District - Bhojpur
8. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Khandol, Block Sandesh, District - Bhojpur
9. Md. Akhatar Alam Son Of Lal Mohamad Resident Of Village - Post Office - Ramasarh Via - Kori, P.S. - Sandesh, District - Bhojpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Mishra, AC to AAG-8 For the Resp. No.9 : Mr. D.S. Vidyarthi, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-06-2016 On 17.5.2016, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent but, the learned counsel for the State and the counsel for the private respondent were present. On that day, learned counsel for the private respondent had informed this Court that the petitioner has already been appointed somewhere on the post of Block Teacher and, as such, he is no longer interested to pursue this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present even today. It seems that the averment made by the private respondent
Patna High Court CWJC No.8523 of 2013 (4) dt.21-06-2016 is correct and, as such, there is no purpose to keep the petition pending.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U