Rajkumar Saw @ Raj Kumar Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27729 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-809 Year-2021 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAJKUMAR SAW @ RAJ KUMAR PRASAD GUPTA Son of Late Late Babulal Saw Resident of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Dobhi, District - Gaya. 2.

Dhiraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar Gupta Son of Raj Kumar Prasad Gupta @ Rajkumar Saw Resident of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Dobhi, District - Gaya. 3.

Riti Kumar @ Ritik Kumar Gupta Son of Raj Kumar Prasad Gupta @ Rajkumar Saw Resident of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Dobhi, District - Gaya. 4.

Prem Kumar @ Prem Kumar Gupta Son of Raj Kumar Prasad Gupta @ Rajkumar Saw Resident of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Dobhi, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, A.P.P.

:

Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 342, 379, 504, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that petitioners came and started assaulting her for no reason and when her son came to save her, he was also assaulted and Prem stole Rs. 1,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27729 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and as far as stealing of Rs. 1,000/- is alleged the same is ornamental in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 809 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T