Vikram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar Keshari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -403 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA KOTWALI District- GAYA ====================================================== Vikram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar Keshari Son of Arjun Keshri @ Arjun .. @ Arun Prasad Keshri, R/o Village- Vairagi, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.N.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No. 403 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 353, 379, 337 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of duplicate Godrej items from his shop and further he has obstructed the police in conducting raid.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of other shopkeepers and he is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court on him if bail is granted. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and on his so
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36718 of 2017 (2) dt.18-08-2017 2/2 surrendering he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Gaya Kotwali Case No. 403 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors should be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned, (ii) Petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution shall be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds, (iii) Petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U