Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36590/2021bail granted

Obedur Rahman @ Abedur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-16Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36590 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2021 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Obedur Rahman @ Abedur Rahman Son of Astab Ali Resident of Village - Balubari, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Dighalbank, District - Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, one stolen motorcycle was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that no FIR has been lodged with respect to theft of the aforesaid motorcycle. Moreso, there is no allegation against the petitioner that he committed theft of motorcycle. Petitioner has claimed clean antecedent and he is in custody since 10.2.2021.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36590 of 2021(2) dt.16-09-2021 2/2 the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Bahadurganj Police Station Case No. 37 of 2021 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T