Patna High CourtMJC/2435/2007disposed

Shankar Prasad Singh v. State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-02Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2435 of 2007 =========================================================== Shankar Prasad Singh, son of Late Musafir Singh, permanent resident of VillageRadhakhar, P.O. Bhagwanpur, District- Kaimur, presently residing at MohallaBhatari (Awadhutnagar) South of Hotel Sherashan, at, P.O. & P.S. Sasaram, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. S.N. Madhvan, the Agriculture Commissioner to the Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Raghvendra Pal Singh, the Director of Agriculture, Bihar, Patna

4. Ram Chandra Ram, The Joint Director, Patna Division, Patna

5. Bishwanath Singh, the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

6. Subhas Prasad Sharma, the District Agriculture Officer, Rohtas

7. Kaishar Tanhid, the Treasury Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

8. Subhas Prasad Sharma, the Project Executive Officer, Sasaram Block, at P.O.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas

9. Gautam Gupta, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

For the State : Mr. Indradev Prasad, S.C.-27 Mr. Krishna Kant Tiwari, S.C.-27 For Accountant General : Mr. L.P.K. Rajgrihar, Standing Counsel =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-03-2017 The writ application filed by the petitioner was allowed on 23rd of July, 2007 directing that the claims of the petitioner be scrutinized and if anything is due and payable to the petitioner, the same be paid to him in addition to the pension. In terms of such direction, an order has been passed on 23rd of January, 2008 (Annexure-F) to the show-cause finding that a sum of Rs. 94,547/- is due and payable to the petitioner.

Since an order has been passed, the petitioner would have

Patna High Court MJC No.2435 of 2007 dt.02-03-2017 2/2 a remedy to challenge the said order in accordance with law before an appropriate forum.

The Contempt Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 07.03.2017 Transmission Date