Sanjeev Kumar @ Banda Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6855 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -184 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar @ Banda Yadav, Son of Surajdeo Yadav, resident of Village- Saren, P.S. Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (A.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 184/17 for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 109 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner along with other 14 persons have been named in the present case on the basis of a videography said to have been done while the accused persons were creating hindrance in the work of the administration and were stopping the traffic movements. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 14 persons have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench of this Court. On the other hand, learned counsel representing the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6855 of 2018 (2) dt.17-02-2018 2/2 State submits that from the F.I.R. itself it will appear that the case of this petitioner has been treated on a different footing inasmuch as he is the person behind all these hindrances and he has got criminal antecedents. In Paragraph 3 of the application, the cases in which the petitioner is accused are also mentioned. Considering the facts and circumstances, particularly the distinguishing feature of the case of this petitioner that he has got criminal history and there are allegations that he had been instrumental in creating hindrance, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
The application is dismissed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR U T