Prabha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.828 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3958 of 2021 ====================================================== Prabha Kumari Wife of Late Uday Shankar Singh, resident at Adarsh Vihar Colony, Rukanpura, Road No. 1, Police Station-Rupaspur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.
Sri Chaitanya Prasad, the Principal Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
Sri Amir Subahani, the Chief Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.
Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, The Accountant General (A and E), Beerchand Patel Path, Patna.
5.
Sri Sandip Ponadrik, the Principal Secretary, Industry Department, Bihar, Patna.
6.
Sri Bimlesh Kumar Jha, The Joint Secretary, General Administrative Department, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Adv. & Advocate General Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj (GP5) For the Accountant General:
Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2022 Pursuant to this Court's order dated 19.10.2022, Mr. Sandip Ponadrik, the Principal Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna is personally present. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Advocate General representing the opposite parties has submitted with reference to the said order of this Court dated 19.10.2022, that the amount of interest has also been paid subject to the outcome of the review application, which has been filed by the State seeking review of
Patna High Court MJC No.828 of 2022(4) dt.09-11-2022 2/2 the order dated 31.01.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3958 of 2021.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has, however, raised certain dispute in relation to the amount which the petitioner is actually entitled to as arrears/interest visa-vis the amount which has actually been paid to him. The said dispute, in the Court's opinion, cannot be made subject matter of the present contempt application, in view of the nature of the order, disobedience of which is being complained in the present proceeding. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to approach appropriate authority/department for redressal of his grievance, if any. The present contempt proceeding stands dropped as in view of the subsequent development, no case is made out of willful disobedience of this Court's order. It is expected that if the petitioner raises any further dispute, the same shall be gone into at appropriate level with due earnest and considered expeditiously.
Personal attendance of the Principal Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, stands dispensed with.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) anand/- U