← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7209/2023dismissed

Abinash Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-26Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7209 of 2023 ====================================================== Abinash Prasad Singh Son of Manna Singh Resident of Rahsha Doyam, Ward No.- 07, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Anchal- Goraul, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Government of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

District Magistrate, Vaishali.

4.

The Circle Officer, Goraul, Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-07-2023 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. A. For commanding the order of compensation to the petitioner of Rs. 10,000,00 (Ten lacs) and punishment to be awarded to the Circle officer, Goraul for illegally demolishing the constructed house and temple of the petitioner on his Raiyati land bearing Khata No. 439, Kheshra No. 1275 having area of 3 decimals on 06.02.2023 without passing any reasoned order or issuing any valid notice while in this regard a Title Suit No. 105/2020 was already pending before Civil

Patna High Court CWJC No.7209 of 2023(2) dt.26-07-2023 2/2 Judge (Senior Division) First, Vaishali at Hajipur but the said matter was not disposed of until now regarding the bona fide title of the said land and the matter was still sub judice.

B. For commanding and directions be given to Respondent authorities to immediately include the name of petitioner as absolute owner of the land bearing Khata No. 439, Kheshra No. 1275 having area of 3 decimals."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U