← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26141/2026bail granted

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26141 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-378 Year-2024 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manoj Yadav Son of Late Wakil Yadav Resident of Village- Sataha Dhani Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Harishankar Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No.378 of 2024 registered for the offence under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

The petitioners and others are said to have killed the brother of the informant.

4.

The petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2025.

5.

From the F.I.R., it appears that one Habib Mian and Jalaluddin Ansari are the assailant of the deceased and the petitioner is one of the members of unlawful assembly. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and also the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26141 of 2026(3) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 period of custody of the petitioner, which is from 01.04.2025, this bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-XI, Motihari, East Champaran / concerned Court below, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No.378 of 2024.

8.

It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the observations made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding this bail application.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T