Rama Shish Choubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9253 of 2014 ====================================================== Rama Shish Choubey, Son of Late Ram Yash Choubey, resident of Village - Basahi, P.S. - Kudra, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District Kaimur, Bhabhua.

3. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram.

4. The Headmaster, High School, Basahi Basawan, District - Kaimur (Bhabhua).

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr Uapdhyay, SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2016 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The grievance of the petitioner is that as against the head of G.P.F, only Rs.45,000/- has been given though the amount is in between rupees two lacs to three lacs.

No counter affidavit has been filed. However, it appears that some whitener was used in the subscription amount of the respective years of the petitioners which was raising suspicion. It appears that total amount was not paid at that point of time which would be evident from Annexure-2.

Having regard to the aforementioned facts and

Patna High Court CWJC No.9253 of 2014 (2) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 circumstances, this Court would direct the District Provident Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram (respondent no.3) to examine the matter and take a final decision in accordance with law. If the petitioner is found entitled, the admissible amount along with statutory interest should be paid within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If there is any dispute with respect to the period where whitener has been used as per Annexure-2 then a decision should be taken by him in accordance with law and it should be communicated to the petitioner.

This disposes of the writ petition.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U