Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2024 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Sah S/o- Ramjee Sah @ Ramji Sah, R/o VillageNagar Panchayat Teghra Ward no.-9, Paigambarpur Goura-6 2.

Rakesh Kumar S/o Ram Kumar Ray @ Ram Kumar Rai, R/o VillagePaigambarpur, ward no 9 Nagar Panchayat, Teghra Both, P.S.- Teghra, District.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.288 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the son of the informant had gone to visit fair where petitioners alongwith other 6-7 accused persons started abusing his son and injured badly by assaulting him with lathi, danda and iron rod. It is further alleged that petitioner no.2 assaulted the son of informant with iron rod over his hand, abdomen and leg causing injury to him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27861 of 2025(2) dt.21-05-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. He further submits that the injury on the injured is simple in nature. The injury report does not corroborate the allegation made by the informant. Petitioner no.1 is a student of intermediate and petitioner no.2 is a young boy of 21 years. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No.288 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T