Bipin Singh@ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29422 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2023 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Bipin Singh@ Chandan Kumar Singh SON OF FULDEO SINGH Resident of village-Baraitha, P.S. Katra, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 Heard Mr. Devendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Katra (Jajuar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 263 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 and 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioner is that he snatched Rs.3,500/- and mobile from the informant when he was going on tempo.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29422 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2 the wife of the petitioner has filed a complaint case against the S.H.O., Inspector and other police for false implication of the petitioner. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T