← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27644/2022bail granted

Rishu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-05Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27644 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2022 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== RISHU KUMAR Son of Raviranjan Sharma Resident of Village - Poari, P.S.- Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anbzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 92 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 38(i), 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 259.60 litres foreign liquor from Swift Dezire Car in question. Petitioner was apprehended on the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27644 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive and malafide intention. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged vehicle and other co-accused. The petitioner bears no criminal antecedent and no incriminating articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2022. Charge sheet has already been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of the petitioner, charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence, and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Exclusive Special Excise Court-1-Cum Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 92 of 2022, subject to following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27644 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 3/3 (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shweta/- U T