Tabassum Ara v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9574 of 2014 =========================================================== Tabassum Ara, Wife of Md. Mokhtar Resident of village - Kharba, P.S. Madhubhan, Block - Kharba, Panchayat Kolhara, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna
3. The District Education Officer, East Champaran
4. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment ), East Champaran
5. The Block Education Officer, Madhubhan, East Champaran
6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Koilhara, P.S. Madhusan, District - East Champaran
7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Koilahara, P.S. Madhuban, District - East Champaran
8. The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, East Champarn, Motihari .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manikant Mishra =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-10-2016 Perused the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, East Champaran, contained in Annexure-4, dated 3rd of April, 2014. The fact that no counseling of the petitioner was held is accepted even by the petitioner, whatever be the circumstances. But the allegation made is also not corroborated by any conduct or grievance having been raised by the petitioner in the near proximity of the so called counseling of the petitioner, not having been
Patna High Court CWJC No.9574 of 2014 dt.17-10-2016 2/2 done.
If that be so, the impugned order is not required to be interfered with, since it does not suffer from any vice.
Writ application is dismissed, accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE Uploading Date 18.10.2016 Transmission Date