Bablu Ray @ Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24320 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== BABLU RAY @ RAI Son of Udit Ray, Resident of Village-Madapur, P.SKudhani, O.P.-Turki, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 447, 323, 307,324, 302, 188, 354, 427 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Kudhani (Turki OP) P.S. Case No. 74/2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated due to village politics. The accusation is general and omnibus in nature. Except being named in the FIR, there is no accusation of committing any offence whatsoever against the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Sonu Rai has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 23046 of 2019. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM III, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kudhani (Turki OP) P.S. Case No. 74/2019,subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24320 of 2019(2) dt.19-04-2019 2/2 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T