Arun Sahani @ Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36525 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2020 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ARUN SAHANI @ ARUN KUMAR Son of Bishwanath Sahani @ Vishwanath Sahni Resident of Village- Bahilwara Govind Laxmipur, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Bela Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saraiya P. S. Case No.414 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2021 and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the informant alleges that on 26.06.2020 at about 7.45 P.M., he proceeded to his house after collecting outstanding dues amount of Rs.1,50,000/-. It is next alleged that while the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36525 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 2/3 informant was coming back to his home along with money, he was intercepted by two miscreants, who looted his motorcycle along with his golden chain, mobile and Rs.1,50,000/-. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. is against unknown. The name of this petitioner transpired in confessional statement of co-accused Pramod Kumar Sahni, who was arrested in Saraiya P. S. Case No.280 of 2020. It is further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner nor this petitioner has been put on T. I. Parade.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has two antecedents as mentioned in Para-3 of the petition, on which the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the present case because he was made accused in two other cases of similar nature as mentioned in Para-3 of the petition.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2021 and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36525 of 2021(2) dt.06-12-2021 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P. S. Case No.414 of 2020.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T