← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27543/2022bail granted

Hukum Chand Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27543 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-389 Year-2021 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== HUKUM CHAND PRASAD Son of Late Jagdish Sao Resident of Village - Purani Arwal, P.S.- Arwal, District - Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alka Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Arwal P.S. Case no. 389 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner started breaking wall with glandar and on protest made by the informant, accused persons started to abuse and assaulted by iron panja on her head due to which she sustained head fracture. When her other family members came there to rescue her, they were also beaten up by the accused persons.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27543 of 2022(3) dt.10-11-2022 2/3 implicated in this case. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. It is not clear and who has assaulted to whom as there was a free fight. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that prior to the alleged incident, an informatory petition was filed by the petitioner due to apprehension of his false implication in any case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Arwal P.S. Case no. 389 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Arwal subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27543 of 2022(3) dt.10-11-2022 3/3