← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41885/2017bail granted

Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41885 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2017 Thana -MOHAMMADPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. KANHAIYA SINGH @ KANHAIYA KUMAR, Son of Arun Singh,

2. Arun Singh, Son of Late Ramjee Singh,

3. Aasha Devi, Wife of Arun Singh, All Residents of Village- Hakam, Police Station- Mohamadpur, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Dimple Devi, Wife of Kanhaiya Singh @ Kanhaiya Kumar, D/o Yogendra Singh, at present R/o Village- Gopalpur, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2017 for the offences instituted under Sections 323, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41885 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2017 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T