Raju Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20302 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALGANJ TOWN District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Raju Sharma, Son of Madan Sharma, Resident of Village- Harkhma Nawka Tola, P.S.- Gopalganj Sadar, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gopalganj Town P.s.Case No.148 of 2016 , registered for offences punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of dowry death and he happens to be brother-in-law.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against him and as a matter of fact at the time of occurrence he was at Quatar and he returned from there after 1 year and 04 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20302 of 2018 (2) dt.25-04-2018 2/2 the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S.Cae no.148 of 2016, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T