← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28425/2026disposed

Shiva Kumar @ Shiva Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28425 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE MAHARAJGANJ DistrictSiwan ====================================================== Shiva Kumar @ Shiva Manjhi Son of Sudama Manjhi Resident of village - Huleshra Ward No. 3, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(c) and 44 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 110 liters of liquor from a shed and a bush at Ward No. 3 along with 1000 liters of Mahua jaggery solution which was destroyed at the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28425 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/3 recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner, but then his sister was arrested and was made to confess about the participation of the petitioner in the occurrence when confessional statement before police has no evidentiary value. It is also submitted that after amendment in the excise act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28425 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 3/3 seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T