Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25931 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2024 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Aman Kumar S/O Munna Singh Resident of Village- Ramdiri Labhaharachak Tola, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Akash Shankar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 47 of 2024, dated 03.04.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 447, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of IPC.
3. As per allegation, the petitioner along with other co-accused came to the house of the informant and started threatening that he should withdraw the previous criminal case filed against the petitioners' side. On protest, they assaulted the informant causing injury on person of the son of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no allegation against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25931 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/3 petitioner that he has made any assault and only allegation against the petitioner is regarding threat. He further submits that similarly situated three co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 03.10.2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70494 of 2024 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the fact that similarly situated three coaccused persons have already been enlarged on anticipatory bail, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25931 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 3/3 with Matihani P.S. Case No. 47 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T