Ravi Kiran Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6275 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-431 Year-2015 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ravi Kiran Singh, Son of Shailendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Goldar Patti 'Ramkrishna Sadan', P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Jayanti Sah, W/o Ravi Kiran Singh and D/o Sri Shishupal Sah, Resident of Kalovganj Mirjanhatt, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anita Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. HUMAYOU AHMAD KHAN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 307, 364, 420, 406, 120 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The cognizance has been taken for an offence under Section 498A IPC. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. Both
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6275 of 2018(3) dt.30-03-2018 2/2 parties are present. The petitioner is ready to keep O.P. No. 2 but O.P. No. 2 denies to stay with the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 431 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T