Ramnarayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36573 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2020 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAMNARAYAN SINGH S/O LATE AGNIDEV SINGH R/O VILLAGE SAGHANPURA, P.S.-KATHAIYA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Anjana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, sections 8, 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. As per the prosecution case, 500 grams of charas, a loaded pistol and 375 litres of liquor was recovered from the possession of the petitioner who was on a motorcycle. The petitioner was arrested.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 20.12.2020 and investigation in the case has concluded. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36573 of 2021(8) dt.22-03-2022 2/2 undertakes to cooperate in the trial. It is further submitted that a supplementary affidavit has been filed stating therein about the deponent of the main petition not having any information about the cases which were all registered in the year 2019 and as the petitioner was living outside the State for earning his livelihood, hence the error in paragraph no. 3 of the petition. Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case especially the recovery of 500 grams of charas from the possession of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U