Jaiprakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26814 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2024 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Jaiprakash Singh son of Late Baban Singh village- Ramgarha, Police StationDaraundha, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and informant as also learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 346 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 329(3), 329(4), 303(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 07.08.2024 by the informant Mohan Prasad.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 07.08.2024, the accused persons came to his door, Satendra Singh, Jaiprakash Singh, Ranjit Singh, Buchi Devi and Kamini Devi started assaulting and the allegations is that they used knives to attack the informant side as a result whereof his son Lalbabu Prasad was seriously injured. This led to the F.I.R.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26814 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/2
4. Though learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court that there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered, only because the son of Satendar Singh tied nuptial knots with the daughter of the informant is the reason for this episode, learned counsel representing the informant has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge observation to show that multiple injuries have been found on the person who got injuries which include the chest, abdomen and thigh.
5. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also that the petitioner is accused in two criminal cases of the same nature, one of the under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
6. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T