Beeru Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2751 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2017 Thana -SIKANDARA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Beeru Singh Son of Late Bachchu Singh, R/o Village- Kumar, P.S.- Sikandara, District- Jamui.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Sikandara P.S.Case No.82 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Act.

Allegation against the appellant is of abusing the informant and he is not returning Rs.17,000/- which he had taken as loan from the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and moreover now he is in custody for 2 1⁄2 months. He is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2751 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned Special P.P. also.

Having heard both sides in view of the above facts and circumstances, this appeal is allowed.

Let the appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000 (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. Ist, Jamui in connection with Sikandara P.S.Case no.82 of 2017 after setting aside order dated 31.08.2017 passed by the learned A.D.J. Ist, Jamui in Sikandara P.S.case No.82 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The appellant shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court concerned and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T