← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1264/2024withdrawn

Madan Mohan Lal Das v. The Bihar State Electricity Board Now Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd.

2025-03-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1264 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6950 of 2012 ====================================================== Madan Mohan Lal Das son of Late Gangadhar Lal Das at present residing at Flat No.-12, Aparajita Apartment, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S. Agam kuan, Patna- 800026.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Electricity Board Now Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman Sri Sanjeev Hans, Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.

2.

Sri Sanjeev Hans the Chairman of the Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

Sri Mahendra Kumar, the Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

Sri Mahendra Kumar the Successor of Joint Secretary, BSEB South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-03-2025 Heard the parties.

The present application has been filed for:

initiating contempt of court proceeding against the RespondentsOpposite Parties and punishing the Opposite Parties-contemnors suitably for their gross inaction amounting to deliberate and intentional non compliance of the directions

Patna High Court MJC No.1264 of 2024(3) dt.05-03-2025 2/2 issued by Hon'ble Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma vide order dated 13.02.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6950 of 2012.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition.

4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U