Sunny Saurav Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28027 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5930 Year-2024 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Sunny Saurav Singh Son of Laxman Singh @ Lakshman Singh Resident of at-Opposite Hanuman Mandir, near Mohan Mill, Mohalla Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District-Patna, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kumari Priya Singh Wife of Sunny Saurav Singh, D/O Sunil Kumar Singh Presently residing at - , R/o Sheikhupura, Milky Mohalla, Bailey Road, Post Office- B.V. College, P.S.- Airport, District-Patna, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP Mr.Satyapal Singh, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 379 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 17,00,000/- (Rupees seventeen lakhs) in four installments, as full and final settlement amount. The petitioner has also agreed to return goods, articles, gold etc., given to him at the time of marriage, to opposite party no. 2 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28027 of 2025(5) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave her consent.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 5930(c) of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28027 of 2025(5) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 Agreement, failing which, learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T