Damodar Pandit v. Pfor. Dr. R.S. Dubey And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2402 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2184 of 2013 ====================================================== Damodar Pandit Son of Late Gurucharan Pandit Resident of Mohalla - Sahebganj, Post office - Champanagar, P.S. University under Kotwali, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. Prof. (Dr.) R.S. Dubey Son of not Known, the Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
2. Prof. ( Dr. ) A.K. Roy Son of not Known the Pro - Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
3. Md. Gulam Mustafa Son of not Known, The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
4. Shri Birendra Prasad Verma Son of not Known, the Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
5. Shri Jayat Kumar Sinha, Son of not known, The Librarian, University Central Library, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur
6. The State of Bihar, through
7. The Director, Sri Sita Ram Singh, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
8. The Principal Secretary, Sri Rameshawar Singh, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Radha Raman Verma, Advocate For the University : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-11-2017 Considering the fact that the respondents have considered and taken a decision and passed an order with regard to pension and other benefits to the petitioner, as is evident from the order dated 19.7.2014, now no further order is required to be taken. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved with regard to the further consideration or action, he shall have liberty to challenge
Patna High Court MJC No.2402 of 2014 (6) dt.29-11-2017 2/2 the same in accordance with law afresh in an appropriate proceeding before an appropriate court or forum. With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, this application is disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) N.H./- U