Vijay Singh v. Rajendra Prasad Singh And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SECOND APPEAL No.358 of 2008 ====================================================== Vijay Singh son of Late Ram Naresh Singh, resident of village & Post OfficeMok, Police Station- Konch, District- Gaya. ..... Defendant.... Respondent .... ... ... Appellant
Versus
1. Rajendra Prasad Singh son of Paras Nath Singh, resident of village Barhahi Bujurg, Pargana, Dadar, Police Station- Goh, Revenue Thana Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
..... Plaintiff .... Appellant .... ... ... Respondent
2. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, son of Rajendra Prasad Singh, resident of village Barhahi Bujurg, Pargana, Dadar, Police Station- Goh, Revenue Thana Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad.
3. Smt. Chinta Mani Debi, daughter of Paras Nath Singh, wife of Sri Hari Nandan Singh, resident of village Malhad, P.O.- Malhad, P.S.- Goh, DistrictAurangabad.
4. Rita Devi @ Rita Devi
5. Manju Debi @ Manju Devi
6. Ranju Debi @ Ranju Devi
7. Ranjan Debi @ Ranjana Devi 4 to 7 are daughter of Ram Naresh Singh, resident of village + post Office Mok, P.s.- Konch, District- Gaya.
..... Defendant.... Respondent .......... Respondents
8. Smt. Shakuntala Devi wife of Rajendra Prasad Singh, resident of village Barahi, Bujurg, P.O.- Dihuri Akaunei, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad.
9. Niraj Kumar, son of Shiv Janam Sharma, resident of village-Bara, P.O.- Kurtha, P.S.- Kurtha, District- Jehanabad.
10. Kum Kum Debi, wife of Ashok Singh, daughter of Shiv Janam Sharma, resident of village Parshawan, P.O.- Konch, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya.
11. Shuma Debi daughter of Shiv Janam Sharma, wife of Ramanuj Singh, resident of village Gaharpur, P.O.- Mahadipur, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya. ..... Defendant .... Respondent ......... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Mrigendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2020 Vide Office notes dated 16.1.2020, the office has pointed out that due to non-compliance of order dated 16.8.2019, the appeal stood dismissed as against respondent nos. 2, 3, 5 to 8 and 9 on 13.9.2019.
Patna High Court SA No.358 of 2008(10) dt.20-01-2020 2/2 Considering the same, the appeal stands dismissed as a whole.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U