← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2582/2014dismissed

Krishna Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-25Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.2582 of 2014 (5) dt.25-11-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2582 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5782 of 2013 ====================================================== Krishna Nandan Prasad, son of Late Prayag Prasad @ Prayag Mahto, resident of village- Utarthu, Post Office- Utarthu, Police Station- Bind, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Shri Deepak Kumar Singh, the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. Mr. Hari Narain, Chief Engineer, Patna Division, Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, Anishabad, Patna

3. Smt. Palaka Sahni, Collector of the District Nalanda

4. Mr. Nagendra Nath Mishra, Executive Engineer, Water Ways Division, Sub Divisional Office, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda

5. Mr. Gajendra Chaudhary, Assistant Engineer-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Water Ways Division, Sub Divisional Office, Biharsharif, Nalanda .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Kr. Prasad, AC to PAAG 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel State.

A second supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of opposite party No.3, the Collector, Nalanda in which it is stated that steps have been taken for acquisition of the land under Satat Lease Policy, 2014 for which a Notification has also been published on 2.11.2016 inviting objections and after the expiry of the period for receiving objections, the petitioner will be made available the amount of compensation by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patna.

In view of the aforesaid statement made in the show cause, the order under contempt appears to have been substantially complied with.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U