← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19690/2010disposed

Raj Kishore Prasad Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-28Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19690 of 2010 ====================================================== Raj Kishore Prasad Sinha S/o. Late Basant Prasad, R/o. Mohalla- Madhubani, P.S. Khajanchi Hat, P.O. & District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principle Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector, Araria.

4. The Additional Collector, District Establishment Collectorate, Araria.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria.

7. The Circle Officer, Araria.

8. The Circle Officer, Kursakata, District- Araria.

9. The Circle Officer, Joki Hat, District- Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Udai Bhanu Rai, GA-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.

2. It transpires to this Court that vide order No.4 dated 05.10.2012, order No.5 dated 26.06.2018, order No.6 dated 27.02.2023, order No.7 dated 16.05.2024, order No.8 dated 25.10.2024 and order No.9 dated 25.11.2024 and order No.10 dated 09.12.2024, matter has been adjourned at the instance of Counsel for the petitioner.

3. It transpires to this Court that petitioner has challenged the order contained in Memo No.1524 dated 23.07.2010, by which he has been dismissed from service.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19690 of 2010(11) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 Petitioner was working as Revenue Karmchari and without preferring statutory appeal he has moved before this Court in the year 2010 in the present writ petition.

4. It transpires to this Court that under the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005, provision of appeal under Rules 23 and 24 of the CCA Rules, 2005 is applicable.

5. As such, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal before the Appellate Authority within 30 days.

6. With this direction, this writ petition is disposed off.

7. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and matter is very old, let Registry be directed to communicate this order to the petitioner's address forthwith at the cost of Office through registered post.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U