← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19247/2015dismiss for nonprosecution

Jai Govind Sharma v. The State Bank Of India R A S M E C S A R C And ORS

2024-04-23Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19247 of 2015 ====================================================== Jai Govind Sharma Son of Late Dhanushdhari Mehta, Resident of Mohalla - Bhikhanpur Gumti No. 2, Police Station Kotwali in the District of Bhagalpur C/o M/S Graduate Engineers Large Industrial Estate, Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Bank Of India R A S M E C S A R C and Ors 2.

The Chief General Manager State Bank of India, RASMECSARK, Patna. 3.

The Deputy General Manager B and O Zonal Officer, Bhawesh Bhawan, Bhagalpur - 812001.

4.

The Assistant General Manager State Bank of India RASMECSARK, Administrative Office Building, Bhaga 5.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Bhagalpur Branch. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For SBI :

Mr.Anjani Kumar Mishra, Adv.

:

Mr. Vijay Bardhan Pandey, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. On 15.04.2024 this Court has passed following orders:- "The matter is coming up for hearing since 13.07.2023.

2. On 29.08.2023, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner it is posted to 12.09.2023. On 25.01.2024, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. As a last indulgence, list this matter on 23.04.2024. No further adjournment shall be granted in this matter"

3. Inspite of posting the matter as a last indulgence, today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19247 of 2015(6) dt.23-04-2024 2/2 Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has no interest to evince the matter.

4. Therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/- U