Tahir Ansari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19355 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1375 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Tahir Ansari,
2. Jahir Ansari, Both sons of Late Sharafat Ansari.
3. Kariman Ansari,
4. Md. Shahid Ansari @ Shahid Ansari. Both sons of Safir Ansari.
5. Md. Anul Sulemani @ Anul Sulemani, son of Rafic Sulemani.
6. Mazeed Ansari, Son of Shalim Ansari.
7. Sabir Ansari, Son of Sumani Ansari.
8. Khursid Ansari, Son of Shalim Ansari.
9. Ladan Ansari, Son of Kalam Ansari.
10. Aslam Ansari, Son of Mokhtar Ansari @ Md. Mukhtar Ahmad.
11. Warish Ansari, Son of Nesar Ansari, All resident of village Amari, P.S. Sasaram, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sasaram (Mufassil) P.S.Case nO.1375 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners and a large number of persons is of assaulting the police personnel. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a girl of their family was traces, as such they were protesting against the police and due to that they have been made accused in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19355 of 2018 (2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2 this case and no specific allegation has been attributed against them.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sasaram, District Rohtas in connection with Sasaram (Mufassil) P.S.Case no.1375 of 2017 dated 23.09.2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T