Shatrughan Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 925 of 2016 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -1626 Year- 2014 Thana - SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- SITAMARHI =================================================== Shatrughan Kumar Son of Sri Amiri Mahto, Resident of Village- Rohua, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Most. Darbi Devi, W/o Late Maru Mahto, R/o VillageRohua, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1 (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

02. 12.01.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376, 511, 354, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the earlier case having been instituted by the father of the Petitioner against the Complainant vide Annexure-3, let the Petitioner, above named who has fair antecedents be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.925 of 2016 (2) dt.12-01-2016 Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. 1626 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T