← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4294/1994disposed

Allaudin Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-04-01Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 4294 of 1994 =========================================================== Allaudin Ahmad, son of late Gulam Ahmed, resident of Village - Chehra Kala, PO - Baksama Jia Mahua, PS & Anchal - Garaul, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 The State of Bihar 2 Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 3 Deputy Director, Consolidation, Vaishali at Hajipur, Bihar 4 Consolidation Officer, Anchal - Goraul, District - Vaishali 5 Md Zakir 6 Md Shoaib 7 Md Sabir, sons of late Md Tahir, residents of Village - Chehra Kala, PO - BaksamaViz Mahua, PS and Anchal - Goraul, District - Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and private respondents.

2 It appears that both the parties are agnates. There was some ancestral land. Petitioner claims that there were certain wrong entries in the revisional survey and he had made an application for correction thereon in the survey proceedings itself. While that matter was pending, the area was notified for consolidation and, accordingly, those proceedings abated. He then filed an application before the Consolidation Officer for necessary correction which was partly allowed. He, thereafter, preferred an appeal but by the time the appeal was taken up, the consolidation proceedings ended and the area was denotified. Accordingly, the appeal proceedings were dropped. The

Patna High Court CWJC No.4294 of 1994 dt.01-04-2015 petitioner is aggrieved by the said order.

3 Having heard the parties, in my view, once the consolidation proceedings have ended, the bar, as contemplated under Section 4 (c) is lifted and, accordingly, it would be open to the petitioner to get the matter finally settled through Civil Court of competent jurisdiction where all the issues with regard to correction of the revisional survey entry or other such question can be gone into and decided. The petitioner would be well advised to avail of the said forum.

4 With these observations, this application stands disposed of.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) M.E.H./- U