Rubi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5231 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2017 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rubi Devi, wife of Nathun Singh, resident of Village- Kure, Police StationGhosi, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Gulnar Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 190 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B),201/34 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody.

Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and submitted that in post-mortem report, 100% burn injury was found on the person injured.

From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5231 of 2018(4) dt.27-02-2018 2/2 allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 190 of 2017 to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and

(3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T