Jalaluddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31737 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2016 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

JALALUDDIN ANSARI Son of Wakil Miya Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran.

2.

Kyamuddin Ansari Son of Wakil Miya Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran.

3.

Nasir Ansari @ Nasir Ali Ansari Son of Bhulai Ansari Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran. 4.

Yemuliya Khatoon @ Yenul Nesha @ Yenuliya Khatoon Wife of Kyamuddin Ansari Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran.

5.

Anwarul Haq Ansari @ Bikau Ansari Son of Kyamuddin Ansari Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran. 6.

Ali Hussain Son of Late Banhu Miya Resident of Village - Dahwa, P.S.- Dhanaha, Distt - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhanaha P.S.case No.156/2016 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners as per FIR is that the petitioners tried to grab the land of the informant, which has been settled in his favour by the Government in the year, 1992-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31737 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 93 and when she protested they lifted her and took her inside the house and tried to disrobe her.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute between the parties and the allegation of disrobing her is ornamental in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 1st, class, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S.Case nO.156 of 2016, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With the above direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T