Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1335 of 2015 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/o Sri Permeshwar Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Krishna Nagar, P.S. Soh Sarai, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna, Bihar.

6. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

8. The Dy. S.P. (Headquarter), Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.

9. The Station House Officer, Soh Sarai, P.S. Nalanda.

10. Alok Kumar, S/o Ajay Prasad, Resident of Village - Muzaffarpur, P.S. - Rajgir, District - Nalanda.

11. Guddu Kumar, S/o Ajay Prasad, Resident of Village - Muzaffarpur, P.S. - Rajgir, District -Nalanda.

12. Arvind Prasad @ Chhote, Resident of Village - basan Bigha, P.S. - Harnaut, District - Nalanda.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, A.C. to A.A.G.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-01-2016 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.13, appearing for the respondents.

After some arguments, Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1335 of 2015 (5) dt.27-01-2016 2/2 to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U