← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27704/2026bail granted

Guddu Kumar Ray @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Praveen Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27704 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Guddu kumar Ray @ Guddu Kumar Son of Musafir Ray Resident Of VillageMathiya Nawada, Ps- Kopa, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 113 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 112 of B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the allegation, altogether 1054.08 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from several vehicle in question and from the truck of this petitioner altogether 336.80 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has been submitted that petitioner was not arrested

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27704 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 from the spot and he has been made accused being the owner of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the search and seizure is in violation of Section 105 of B.N.S.S. and the petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2026 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the records.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 113 of 2026.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T