Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27230/2022bail rejected

Ramishwari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27230 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2016 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ramishwari Yadav Son Of Chanswar Yadav R/O Village- Chalish Kurwa, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including this petitioner caused death of the daughter of the informant for dowry.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured his wife (deceased).It is further submitted that the wife of the petitioner fell ill suddenly and when she was being taken to the hospital she died on the way to the hospital itself. Petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27230 of 2022(2) dt.22-09-2022 2/2 got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is husband of the deceased and there is direct and specific allegation against him that he killed his wife for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. The deceased died within seven years of her marriage in her matrimonial house.

Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/Aditi U T