Antu Sah @ Antu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34439 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-650 Year-2013 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== ANTU SAH @ ANTU RAM Son of Ram Jatan Sah Resident of VillageGehuwa, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Umarawati Devi Wife of Antu Sah D/o Baliram Sah, Resident of VillageGehuwa, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. At present address at Village- Dharwar, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.650 of 2013 for the offences under Sections 498A, 494, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and as per the complaint petition filed by the complainant, the petitioner was demanding motorcycle and colour T.V. and for that ousted her from the house and later on a compromise has been reached between the parties and the petitioner has taken her but again ousted her from the house. It is also alleged that petitioner has solemnized another marriage with one Rikha Devi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34439 of 2019(5) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 and she has also been made accused in this case . When she went there she was assaulted.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is ready to keep her. In this case notice was issued to the O.P.no.2 but it appears that father of the O.P.no.2 has refused to receive the notice stating that the O.P.no.2 has gone her Naihar. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Considering the facts as stated above and also considering the aspect that this is a repeated occurrence made by the petitioner and he has solemnised another marriage also, I am not inclined to grant privilege of the anticipatory bail to the petitioner and he is directed to surrender before the learned court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered on the basis of the materials available on the record without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and the provisional bail earlier granted, vide order dated 17.8.2019 is withdrawn. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T