Shambhu Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28165 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2021 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== SHAMBHU SAW S/o Late Jairam Saw Resident of Village-Pasiya, Police Station- Atri, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his/her arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 147, 149, 341, 323, 308, 354, 504, 506 IPC.
Allegedly, on account of some altercation, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioner assaulted the informant with leg, fist and lathi and threatened her of dire consequences. The petitioner also tried to outrage the modesty of the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28165 of 2022(3) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 There is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is agnate and co-sharer of the informant and there is previous dispute between them with regard to ancestral property. The injuries received by the informant is grievous in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the injury is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T