Janardan Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10392 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-725 Year-2017 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ======================================================
1. Janardan Paswan, S/o Shivpujan Paswan,
2. Butan @ Ayodhaya Paswan S/o Krishna Paswan,
3. Indal Paswan S/o Vikash Paswan, All R/o Village- Amrudiya tola Akhtiarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SRI NARSINGH TANTI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bihta P.S. case no. 725 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341,323,354,447,504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners that when the informant was returning home from call of nature all the petitioners misbehaved with her and petitioner no.1 attempted to caught hold her hand. She anyhow fled away and made complaint with her husband then accused persons abused her husband and also gave threat to kidnap the informant.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10392 of 2018(2) dt.23-02-2018 2/2 petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Bihta P.S. case no. 725 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. 1st Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T