Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32179/2024bail granted

Dhrup Yadav @ Druv Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-29Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32179 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2023 Thana- BHITAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Dhrup Yadav @ Druv Yadav Son of Babu Nand Yadav Resident of VillageRupahi Yadav Tola, Police Station- Bhitaha, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bhitaha P.S. Case No. 217 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 17.400 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the seized motorcycle in question and name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by local chowkidar. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32179 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2024 and has got four criminal antecedents in which the petitioner is on bail in three cases. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhitaha P.S. Case No. 217 of 2023, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T