Rajan Pandit v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.700 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== Rajan Pandit Son of Jamun Pandit Resident of Mohalla- Suratganj Gandhi Chowk, Ward No.- 23, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director General of Police, Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 4.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 5.
The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 6.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 7.
The Officer-in-charge of Madhubani Town Police Station, Madhubani District-Madhubani.
8.
The Investigation Officer of Madhubani Town P.S. Case No. 109 of 2025, District-Madhubani 9.
The owner and Holder of the mobile no.9075979386. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 14-05-2025 Heard Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned AC to AG for the respondent-State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the development which has
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.700 of 2025(4) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 taken place after filing of the present petition.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that we have not examined the case of the petitioner on merits.
(Vipul M. Pancholi, J) (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) harish/-utkarsh/- U T